Saturday, April 10, 2010

Population Minister Tony Burke says migrants should go bush

AUSTRALIA'S first population minister will explore whether immigration rules can be used to dictate where new migrants live and work.

Tony Burke said it was "not in the national interest" for newcomers to settle in areas where they put extra pressure on infrastructure and jobs when rural and regional employers were crying out for workers.

Mr Burke, who has been tasked with tackling the nation's population disparities, said he believed Australia could better target its immigration policies, The Courier-Mail reports.
"There is probably more that we can do than we've done in the past in the immigration program in saying, 'If you're coming to Australia there are parts of Australia where we need you to get your first job,' " he said.

His comments come as the debate over population and immigration heats up, with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd saying earlier this year he believed in "a big Australia".

A Lowy Institute poll out today shows that while almost three-quarters of those surveyed support a bigger Australia, 69 per cent do not believe the nation should swell to 36 million by 2050.

Institute executive director Michael Wesley said: "The poll shows Australians are comfortable with some increase in population size, but are not in full support of the 36 million projected in the Government's Intergenerational Report."

Mr Burke told 2GB radio yesterday 36 million was a projection, not government policy.

"There'll be some parts of the country that can take more people, and it is in our economic interests in those parts of the country to be able to let those businesses get the workers they need," he said.

Mr Burke said he wasn't talking about using cash incentives in relation to migrants.

"I'm saying we can set the rules by which people come to the country if they're coming under those business programs," he said.

Premier Anna Bligh said this week Queensland should have a greater say on where migrants settled in order to plug employment shortages.

In the past financial year, Australia's migration program accounted for 171,318 people.

Two categories, the regional sponsored migration scheme and state/territory sponsored migration, tied migrants to work in particular areas and accounted for 22,821 people.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said yesterday Australia needed a national debate on population growth.

"In good years numbers ought to go up, in bad years numbers ought to go down," Mr Abbott told the ABC.

"I want to see a rich Australia, but if we have more people without the infrastructure to make the population sustainable, we won't be stronger and we won't be richer."

Source: heraldsun.com.au/

Migrant construction workers: overlooked and in danger

Migrant deaths make up an abnormally large proportion of fatalities in construction. Photograph: Bulent Kilic/AFP/Getty Images

Chen, a Chinese builder from Da-ao village in Fuqing, has been working on construction sites in London for two years. In a recent accident, he lost a finger on his left hand when it was crushed by a metal beam. To survive, and to continue sending money home, he carries on working with just the use of his right hand.

"Accidents happen all the time and that's the rule of the industry," says Chen. "We have to look after ourselves and live with the risks. We have only our own bad luck to blame if we get hurt." But was it really just a simple matter of him being in the wrong place at the wrong time?

Construction is one of the biggest and most dangerous industries in Britain. In the last 25 years, more than 2,800 people have died from injuries on sites. Serious incidents occur far too frequently, with more than 1,000 workers a month hurting themselves.

According to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), 8% of Britain's 2.3m construction workers are migrants, yet they account for 17% of work-related deaths. Research shows that, as a result of their position within an industry built on rules of maximum flexibility and profitability through subcontracting, they are more at risk than their local counterparts.

HSE inspector Simon Hester says: "Nearly 40% of construction workers in London are migrants. We find they are increasingly working in unsafe and unhealthy environments. Construction workers are more at risk on small sites, with far more fatalities and injuries – and many migrant workers tend to work on small sites."

Last April, HSE's construction division began a 12-month outreach campaign, managed by Hester, to raise awareness of health and safety and improve protection for those workers in London. The project targeted three groups: Polish, Gujarati and Romanian, who account for 25%, 8% and 6% respectively of the UK's migrant construction workforce.

At the Polish Association in west London, HSE's Polish-language posters stand out. "The community and press have been very supportive," says Bartek Zdrowowicz, HSE's Polish outreach officer.

Jerzy Kapszewicz, director of Kasa, a popular Polish employment and training centre, is optimistic about the scheme. "Before Poland joined the EU in 2004, Polish workers were in similar situations to undocumented migrants," he says. "They had nowhere to turn to when accidents occurred. Now we have more than 100 Poles here each month to do training for the Construction Skills Health and Safety test, as part of the requirement to apply for a CSCS [Construction Skills Certification Schemes] card."

Despite this, Zdrowowicz says there is often confusion about what the HSE does. "The equivalent institution in Poland deals with employment issues, as well as health and safety, and it can fine people immediately," he says. "Once, we inspected a site where the Polish builders thought I was local and started to discuss how much cash they had on them in case we were going to fine them on the spot."

For many, the biggest barrier to health and safety on sites is language. Zbigniew Hargesheimer, a former building worker who now trains people at Kasa, says: "I wonder why there isn't funding for migrants to learn English for construction. Many employers don't give safety inductions in Polish."

Part of the HSE outreach team's job is to correct that. One day I joined Zdrowowicz and HSE inspector Monica Babb on several unannounced site inspections in Kensington.

Dozens of high-risk building sites were situated in the affluent neighbourhood. The first we came across was a two-storey site with a huge amount of woodwork and dust, but not one fire extinguisher. The Gujarati-speaking labourers were working away with their heads down. There were no proper chairs for them to sit on for a break, nor basic washing facilities or warm water. Babb gave a prohibition notice to the foreman and asked him to stop work immediately until improvements were made.

A worker looked on nervously, but soon felt more relaxed after talking to outreach officer Rhaynukaa Soni on the phone. He told me: "The bosses don't care about our health and safety, and we can't complain. If you do, you'll get sacked, like I was in my last job in Wembley."

Soni says it has taken time to convince workers that the HSE isn't the same as the UK Border Agency. "Building trust is the most important thing," she says. "The first thing we tell people is that health and safety law protects you even if you're not working here legally. We tell them they can make anonymous reports about their work."

At midday, we went into an almost-refurbished flat where five Polish painters were working. Zdrowowicz's explanations in Polish reassured them, which allowed Babb to then advise them to change their ladder.

Turning a corner in Kensington, we visited a five-storey site where the scaffolding was so poorly installed, with clearly visible gaps, that it looked almost like the Romanian builders were working in mid-air. They spoke little English and didn't seem to know the safety risk they had been put in by their employer, who said he couldn't get back in time to meet us. We crawled up the stairs behind one of the workers who showed us around. Babb decided not to go up to the top floor as they were becoming shaky without secure flooring and rails. Unsurprisingly, a prohibition notice was issued.

There are reasons why Romanian workers in particular can find themselves doing high-risk work like this: many of the estimated 50,000 in the UK are in construction as a result of restrictions on their work rights. Both Romanians and Bulgarians have UK employment limited to small quotas in food processing and agriculture, despite their EU member-state status – unless they declare themselves to be "self-employed" agents.

Construction union Ucatt estimates there are 1m casual construction workers with false "self-employed" status in the UK, made possible by the government's Construction Industry Scheme.

These workers are denied employment rights and employers (often agencies) avoid paying national insurance for them. Workers can be dismissed without notice, as reportedly happened at the London Olympic site last year.

Ivan, from Bulgaria, has been working in construction in London for eight years. He says: "The Bulgarians and Romanians tend to keep quiet about their safety and rights because of this false status."

He tells me of an office and shopping complex in central London where he was employed by a contractor. "The company employs mainly Russians and Bulgarians and our wages were kept low," Ivan says. "Their intention was to make us work to the bone – I became extremely stressed and depressed but carried on, to pay my rent."

In front of the Romanian Orthodox Church in London, Romanian workers show similar despair. A "self-employed" builder, who has just finished working on a hotel development, says: "Health? Safety? Bosses don't care." Work has dried up and he's now sleeping rough.

The HSE campaign will build on a solid base of achievement and run for another year. There may also be extra funds to extend the project to other main migrant construction worker communities, such as Bulgarians, Lithuanians and Chinese.

Simon Hester has identified the Chinese, in particular, as a hidden and exploited group. The tens of thousands in London work mostly on small sites via gangmasters, because it's difficult to access large companies without papers. These workplaces may have few safety mechanisms in place.

Helen Yang, a community organiser for London Citizens, remembers the tragic death of a Chinese builder: "He had fallen from 12ft after stumbling through a skylight that wasn't glass-fitted and not properly marked by his employer, Sharaz Butt of Alcon Construction." While the employer was sentenced to 12 months in prison for manslaughter, the worker left behind his wife and three young children.

Ah Long, a gangmaster in London, admits there have never been safety instructions or risk assessment on sites he knows about. "It's not considered necessary because most Chinese builders work indoors … they rarely wear safety boots – we don't think it's necessary."

Chinese construction workers' informal immigration status, and their desperate need to get work and get paid, has kept them in high-risk workplaces.

On my tour with the HSE, at a shop in Watford, I was led into a 4 sq m space where 42-year-old Ah Zhong and his two co-workers live. They've been here for four years, as low-cost builders for a care-home owner.

"My boss found me years ago, when I left Morecambe Bay after the other team of workers drowned there in 2004," Zhong says. "We were paid £40 per day. When I got badly burnt by a steamer because no one showed me how to use the machine, my bao gong tou [gangmaster] took half the money I was given during my sick days.

"Now the British boss asked me to work for him directly – so he can spend less on my labour. We've been paid £50 per day. Health and safety isn't his concern, but this is an ongoing, regular job that's difficult to find. Many builders have to put up with frequent wage arrears or non-payment."

Chris Kaufman, a Unite union spokesman and formerly a board member of the Gangmasters Licensing Authority (GLA), said: "The construction industry is most similar to agriculture in that there are countless illegal practices … Unite is keen to see the remit of gangmasters licensing extended to other sectors such as construction."

Source: guardian.co.uk/

India's migrant workers face hostility in Mumbai

In India's crowded and burdened cities such as Mumbai, local politicians have rekindled antimigrant attitudes by trying to restrict labor licenses to those who can speak a local language. Most migrant workers cannot.

Rakeshkumar Das fears that nativist laws will end his longtime job as a Mumbai cabdriver. Like most migrant workers here, he cannot speak the local language, Marathi. His family lives 36 hours away by train.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff

Source: csmonitor.com/

Migration to Australia is a key election issue

The number of people emigrating to Australia is becoming a key battleground in the countries forthcoming election.

Both the ruling Labor party, headed by PM Kevin Rudd, and the Liberal’s, who are led by Tony Abbott, take opposing sides on the “Big Australia” debate.

Australia’s new Population Minister Tony Burke says the opposition must explain its new position on migration to the business community.The Opposition’s Spokesman, Scott Morrison, says the migration rate should be lower to achieve a lower population than the 36 million people that the Treasury predicts for 2050.

Mr Morrison says the net migration rate is 300,000 a year and he argues that’s too high.But Mr Burke says that includes 120,000 temporary visitors such as students or workers brought in to deal with skills shortages.

“Essentially what they’re saying to all the people who are relying on jobs in those sorts of sectors that they’re willing to put caps and cuts against those temporary migration figures now normally we’ve always spoken about permanent migration when we’ve dealt with these sorts of capacity issues,” he said. ”The Opposition ventured into some very new territory today.”

Tags: Australian election

Source: australiamagazine.co.uk/

Alcatel-Lucent Migration Operation Center Now Open in Turkey






By Susan J. Campbell, TMCnet Contributing Editor

Alcatel-Lucent has opened a new Migration Operation Center (MOC) in Turkey. As of March 2010, this MOC is fully operational, staffed with 50 highly skilled experts that manage complex migration projects from the region to support local and international customers.
"As service providers pursue transformation initiatives to meet key business objectives, they are increasingly seeking partners with unique skills to assist in their transformation activities,” said Curtis Price, the Program Vice President of IDC’s (News - Alert) Infrastructure Services group, in a statement.

“Through its global delivery network of Migration Operation Centers (MOC), Alcatel-Lucent (News - Alert) has developed a strong set of services for assisting operators with complex migration efforts. The new MOC in Turkey expands Alcatel-Lucent's capabilities, and allows the company to continue delivering global solutions that meet service provider transformation requirements."

This new MOC is positioned as complimenting Alcatel-Lucent’s existing migration capabilities in countries such as Poland, India and Australia. In addition, the center will deliver extensive value as it is capable of delivering critical and complex voice and data migration services in multi-technology and multi-vendor legacy and IP environments.

“Alcatel-Lucent has built unique tools, methodologies and a full set of professional services that help service providers address the complexity of customer and subscribers migration towards new networks. These capabilities enable the automation of the migration process while keeping risks and costs under control,” said Ali Kancal, Head of Alcatel-Lucent’s activities in Turkey and Azerbaijan.

“Part of Alcatel-Lucent Global Competency Centers, our new Migration Operation Center in Turkey reinforces our talent base in Turkey and brings a new dimension to our worldwide capabilities. This MOC combines global expertise and customer intimacy and is another key differentiator for our company in Turkey and in the region.”

In providing solutions for service providers’ transformation projects, Alcatel-Lucent demonstrates the importance of value-added delivery capabilities in Turkey and in the EMEA region to support customers as they make the transition to a High Leverage Network architecture and differentiate and grow their business all while reducing the overall cost structure.

In other Alcatel-Lucent news, the communications service provider grabbed headlines when it announced that its “Alternative Energy Program for Global Green Telecommunications” was declared a winner in the 2010 European Commission's Sustainable Energy Europe, or “SEE,” campaign, in the “Market Transformation-Voluntary Commitments” category.

Earlier this week, Alcatel-Lucent announced an enhancement to its microwave packet radio portfolio for the North American market with additional features and support for additional frequency bands.

Susan J. Campbell is a contributing editor for TMCnet and has also written for eastbiz.com. To read more of Susan’s articles, please visit her columnist page.

Edited by Patrick Barnard

Source: next-generation-communications.tmcnet.com/

Bangladeshi migration a huge phenomenon: Tharoor

Minister of State for External Affairs Shashi Tharoor Friday termed illegal migration of Bangladeshi nationals to India as a 'huge human phenomenon'.

'This phenomenon cannot be solved overnight. India and Bangladesh must work together to contain this illegal migration,' Tharoor told journalists at the sidelines of an international conference on 'From Landlocked to Landlinked: North East India in BIMSTEC'.

An estimated 20 million Bangladeshis are living in India illegally. Most of them are economic migrants, who abandon their homes for better living in India.

'A successful and prosperous Bangladesh is in the interest of our country's success and prosperity,' Tharoor asserted.

Terming India-Bangladesh relation was on the 'upswing', he said the improvement was reflected in the recent visit of Bangladesh premier Sheikh Hasina to India, during which several bilateral agreements were signed.

Asked on China's failure to recognise Arunachal Pradesh as an 'integral part of India', Tharoor said it was a 'reflection of the unresolved dispute' between the two countries.

'We wanted the long-standing border dispute with China resolved peacefully and therefore held 13 rounds of talks so far,' he said.

He also said that the India-China border has been 'tranquil' and there has been no incident in the recent past.

'Indo-China relationship must be viewed in the broader context. Both countries are improving trade and people-to-people contact,' he added.

Moreover, to improve neighbourly relationships, Tharoor said, 'our generosity gives more than its fair share' towards development of the region.

'India by virtue of having 70 percent population and 80 percent Gross Domestic Product of South East Asia is in a position to contribute more than its share for the region,' Tharoor said.


Source: sify.com/

Total migration to base rate by Dec

Mumbai: While banks have to start lending as per a base rate from July, they have six months till December end to migrate completely to the new system. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Friday that for existing loans, the base rate would be applicable once they matured. For new loans, the base rate will be levied immediately. Also existing borrowers can shift to base rate, before their loans mature.
Banks, however, cannot charge customers any fee for such switchover. The banks should announce their base rates after seeking approval from their respective asset liability committee (ALCOs)/ Boards. M Narendra, executive director, Bank of India, said his bank has put technology in place and are ready to implement the base rate regime by July 1 as has been stipulated by the RBI.
All the existing customers with sanctioned limits will continue to be on old rates. However, all new customers will have to come under the base rate system. Some borrowers like SMEs will derive benefits from it.
Since the base rate will be the minimum rate for all loans, banks are not permitted to resort to any lending below the base rate. Accordingly, the current stipulation of bench mark prime lending rates (BPLR) as the ceiling rate for loans up to Rs 2 lakh stands withdrawn, said RBI.
On applicability of base rate, the central bank has said the new rate could also serve as the reference benchmark rate for floating rate loan products, apart from external market benchmark rates. The floating interest rate based on external benchmarks should, however, be equal to or above the base rate at the time of sanction or renewal.
RBI will separately announce the stipulation for export credit vis-à-vis base rate.
The central bank has further said banks are required to review the base rate at least once in a quarter with the approval of the board or the ALCOs as per the bank’s practice.
However, loans such as differential rate of interest (DRI) advances, loans to banks’ own employees and loans to banks’ depositors against their own deposits could be priced without reference to the base rate
The changes in the base rate will be applicable in respect of all existing loans linked to it in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner. Since transparency in the pricing of lending products has been a key objective, banks are required to display the information...

Source:  financialexpress.com/
 

Foreign workers will remain a fact of life

"Like leaving Wayne Rooney on the bench" is how Tim Montgomerie describes the Tory high command's dogged refusal to put immigration at the centre of the election campaign. Like other activists, the editor of the influential ConservativeHome blog wants his party to be much more aggressive in attacking one of Labour's biggest perceived failings.
Among voters, immigration is seen as the most important issue the country faces after the economy. An influx of more than 1m east Europeans since 2004 and soaring unemployment after the financial crisis have been a potent brew. A recent government poll found that 77 per cent of respondents wanted a reduction in immigration.
Yet, having seen how voters were repelled by Michael Howard's "Are you thinking what we're thinking?" campaign in 2005, and his focus on unwanted migrants and asylum seekers, the Cameroons have steered clear of exploiting the public mood with "dog whistle" politics.
In truth, their lead here is so healthy they can afford to stay on the side of the angels. A recent YouGov poll shows the Tories hold a 23-point advantage on immigration, bigger than on any other issue.
For Labour, the subject is painful. Early forecasts suggested that up to 13,000 Poles and other eastern Europeans would arrive each year after their countries joined the European Union in 2004. This was a huge underestimate - the accession of the so-called A8 nations created the biggest wave of inward migration in British history.
Belatedly, the party leadership has woken up to the fact that this worries large parts of the country, not least white working-class voters who believe migrants are taking jobs and depressing wages.
There is scant evidence to back up this belief. Oxford University's Centre on Migration, Policy and Society says the impact of foreign workers on unemployment is "minimal" and on wages "extremely small". All major parties stress the economic benefits that migration brings to the UK.
Nevertheless, recognising the potential for political damage, Gordon Brown, the prime minister, has taken up the banner of "British jobs for British workers".
Alan Johnson, home secretary and Labour's voice of the common man, also admits the party has been "maladroit" in failing to recognise the depth of feeling over the issue.
Despite the government's discomfort, there is in fact little difference between the parties' policies on how to tackle mass migration and population growth.
The Tories say they want net migration back at the levels of the 1990s, when it ran at about 40,000-50,000 people a year. They plan to do this through capping the number of skilled workers coming from outside the EU, though some experts say this is more likely to annoy business than deliver the reductions they want.
Labour has already started cutting the number of non-EU workers through an Australian-style points-based system, and a recession-led drop in eastern European arrivals means net migration is falling.
What is clear for both parties is that large-scale migration will remain a fact of life whoever is in charge, with

Source:http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1f8aaa32-436e-11df-833f-00144feab49a.html

Thursday, April 8, 2010

247 news for sell

 New news migration

Sources: G news   CNN News